Greetings,
We are nearing the end of National Poetry Month, and I've been sharing a lot of what I write with others in order to celebrate it. But I wondered what else I could do as we honor those who embrace the written word, so I thought I would tell you all about some things that have always been a big inspiration to me - movies about writers. There are a lot of good ones out there, and maybe you haven't heard of some of them. So, I'll be sharing a few with you all today. And I'm not just talking about films that have writers in them. I mean ones that are really about writers. You know the difference. Now I could have done a Top Ten list or something, but I don't think I could even rate all these movies that way. Therefore, I'm just going to randomly talk about some of them in a bit of a rapid fire way. I'll save the details for if I review them. Or if I've reviewed them already. However, if I was going to do a list, let's start with what I would put at Number One.
That's right. It's The Whole Wide World. I think this was the first review I ever did on this blog, which is good because it's one of my favorite movies of all time. It's D'Onofrio and Zelwegger at their best. And while on the subject of films about real life writers, I suggest Infamous, the Capote biopic that I personally think was better than Capote. Sorry. Though the latter may be a good one to watch as well. Sylvia was pretty good, albeit a bit depressing, and Saving Mr. Banks is a winner, if you don't mind disliking the protagonist. Yes, I consider P.L. Travers to be the protagonist. For something more fantastical, may I suggest an oldie but a goodie, Hans Christian Andersen. It's got music! And dancing! And Danny Kaye!
For some more modern takes on, not only writers and their process, but how it affects and can be affected by their relationships, may I suggest the Edward Burns penned, Purple Violets, a great family film starring Morgan Freeman called The Magic of Belle Isle or Starting Out in the Evening, which, I think, contains Frank Langella's best performance. Each of them shows how those who come in and out of our lives can have an incredible impact on our work as writers.
If you want a scare along with your inspiration, I suppose the best place to look is the movies that have spawned from Stephen King books. This is where Misery and The Dark Half come into the picture. I've said it before; I'll say it again. I can't believe he wrote a book giving people writing advice when his fiction seems to want to keep people far away from the profession.
Some critically acclaimed writer films that I like include Wonder Boys, which was shot near where I live, and I still like it despite a few of its flaws (Cough, cough...Robert Downey, Jr...cough, cough), The Squid and The Whale, which I like despite a few problems I have with it...like the younger son character. Just no. I also like Stranger Than Fiction, as it has a unique concept to which many writers can relate - the concept that our characters aren't just characters.
Unfortunately, not all the writer movies I like have been received so well by critics and audiences. Paper Man, Authors Anonymous, Stuck in Love, to name a few. Not everyone was crazy about these, but I like them. And that's all that matters. Because I am awesome.
I could go on and on when it comes to this subject, but that's all I'm going to tell you about today. Whilst I believe these movies can inspire writers, I don't want reading my blog to distract said writers from writing. But as I said, I did full-on reviews of quite a number of these before, as well as of ones I didn't mention here. Hopefully, you'll find some films you can enjoy, and if you are a writer, I hope these stories will inspire you.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
Friday, April 28, 2017
Saturday, April 22, 2017
Nancy Drew - Movie Review
Greetings,
So, I'm pretty smart, right? And I've always been that way. Even when I was a youngster. Also, I love mysteries. Whether it's Sherlock Holmes stories or the cases on my favorite show, Law & Order, I like figuring things out with clues. Good times, indeed. So, all things considered, I love Nancy Drew. Now I must admit, I've only read a handful of the books, but that was all it took for me to become a fan. And as it turns out there have been quite a few adaptations of the books, mostly on TV and by way of the PC games, which I love. (Side Note: Check out the YouTube channel of Arglefumph: The Nancy Drew Dude!) But when it comes to film, there were about four of them back in the 30's and then, many decades later came the adaptation I will be discussing today, 2007's Nancy Drew.
Nancy Drew stars Emma Roberts as the titular character, and I happen to think that she was a good choice. She had a certain charm and precociousness about her that fit the character well. The plot of the film follows Nancy, as she and her father, Carson, played by very well cast Tate Donovan, leave their hometown of River Heights and head for L.A. where he has a temporary job. Okay, Problem #1. I have no idea why they took her out of River Heights for this, her first film in about 70 years. I mean, we barely get to see Bess and George, or Hannah. What's up with that? We do get quite a bit of Ned, though, who is played by Max Thieriot. Problem #2. I wasn't necessarily a fan of this choice in casting of such an important character. Believe it or not, I think he looked too young, and I don't think he ever clicked properly. Just my opinion. Oh, and Problem #3, it's set in modern times. At least, it is when they get to L.A., even though everyone in River Heights is acting like it's 1953.
Anyway, when they get out to California, Nancy and her father settle into a house that is the center of a mystery, and she chose it specifically for that reason. Problem #4. I don't recall Nancy ever deliberately going after mysteries. I thought she always just fell into them whilst living her life. Though I could be wrong. The mystery is actually about the disappearance and subsequent death of a famous actress from years earlier. To be fair, that aspect of the film isn't bad at all. It is a decent story which moves the plot along nicely.
But in between trying to solve the mystery, Nancy has to go to school, where she's not at all liked and is picked on by the "cool girls". Although, she does find herself a little sidekick...for the entire duration of the film. Problem # ... whatever. These side characters are kind of annoying. Not knocking the kid actors here. I'm sure they're very nice and talented in real life, but I just don't know about the people they were portraying. They just seem to get in the way. I feel like Nancy would have done much better on her own. Or with Bess and George!! Okay, I have to move on from that.
Look, I know I've been listing my issues with this film, to and fro, but I do think it has some very redeeming qualities, besides the ones I already mentioned. Rachel Leigh Cook, Marshall Bell and Barry Bostwick show up in this and I think they all did a fantastic job. And from a clearly aesthetic perspective, I thought the set design was wonderful, particularly the mystery house. And I loved the wardrobe that they gave Nancy. It was very throwback to a nostalgic time. Like maybe the time in which this film should have been set. No, stop it. We're concentrating on the good things. Of which they are quite a few.
Bottom line is this. I may have some problems with Nancy Drew, but overall, it's not that bad. It's not the best movie I've ever seen, but it sure as heck is not the worst. It is what it is, and what it is, in fact, is a pretty cute film. And sometimes, that's all we need. So, if it seems like something you might enjoy, give it a watch.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
So, I'm pretty smart, right? And I've always been that way. Even when I was a youngster. Also, I love mysteries. Whether it's Sherlock Holmes stories or the cases on my favorite show, Law & Order, I like figuring things out with clues. Good times, indeed. So, all things considered, I love Nancy Drew. Now I must admit, I've only read a handful of the books, but that was all it took for me to become a fan. And as it turns out there have been quite a few adaptations of the books, mostly on TV and by way of the PC games, which I love. (Side Note: Check out the YouTube channel of Arglefumph: The Nancy Drew Dude!) But when it comes to film, there were about four of them back in the 30's and then, many decades later came the adaptation I will be discussing today, 2007's Nancy Drew.
Nancy Drew stars Emma Roberts as the titular character, and I happen to think that she was a good choice. She had a certain charm and precociousness about her that fit the character well. The plot of the film follows Nancy, as she and her father, Carson, played by very well cast Tate Donovan, leave their hometown of River Heights and head for L.A. where he has a temporary job. Okay, Problem #1. I have no idea why they took her out of River Heights for this, her first film in about 70 years. I mean, we barely get to see Bess and George, or Hannah. What's up with that? We do get quite a bit of Ned, though, who is played by Max Thieriot. Problem #2. I wasn't necessarily a fan of this choice in casting of such an important character. Believe it or not, I think he looked too young, and I don't think he ever clicked properly. Just my opinion. Oh, and Problem #3, it's set in modern times. At least, it is when they get to L.A., even though everyone in River Heights is acting like it's 1953.
Anyway, when they get out to California, Nancy and her father settle into a house that is the center of a mystery, and she chose it specifically for that reason. Problem #4. I don't recall Nancy ever deliberately going after mysteries. I thought she always just fell into them whilst living her life. Though I could be wrong. The mystery is actually about the disappearance and subsequent death of a famous actress from years earlier. To be fair, that aspect of the film isn't bad at all. It is a decent story which moves the plot along nicely.
But in between trying to solve the mystery, Nancy has to go to school, where she's not at all liked and is picked on by the "cool girls". Although, she does find herself a little sidekick...for the entire duration of the film. Problem # ... whatever. These side characters are kind of annoying. Not knocking the kid actors here. I'm sure they're very nice and talented in real life, but I just don't know about the people they were portraying. They just seem to get in the way. I feel like Nancy would have done much better on her own. Or with Bess and George!! Okay, I have to move on from that.
Look, I know I've been listing my issues with this film, to and fro, but I do think it has some very redeeming qualities, besides the ones I already mentioned. Rachel Leigh Cook, Marshall Bell and Barry Bostwick show up in this and I think they all did a fantastic job. And from a clearly aesthetic perspective, I thought the set design was wonderful, particularly the mystery house. And I loved the wardrobe that they gave Nancy. It was very throwback to a nostalgic time. Like maybe the time in which this film should have been set. No, stop it. We're concentrating on the good things. Of which they are quite a few.
Bottom line is this. I may have some problems with Nancy Drew, but overall, it's not that bad. It's not the best movie I've ever seen, but it sure as heck is not the worst. It is what it is, and what it is, in fact, is a pretty cute film. And sometimes, that's all we need. So, if it seems like something you might enjoy, give it a watch.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
Monday, April 17, 2017
Thoughts on Stayin' Alive: A Grammy Salute to the Music of the Bee Gees
Greetings,
So, last night, CBS aired a big old tribute to my beloved Bee Gees. Good timing, I'd say, since 50 years ago, they hit it big in the U.S., 40 years ago, they recorded the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack, and most importantly, 20 years ago, they released Still Waters, my favorite of their albums. Yes, that last one is most important.
Now, anytime a tribute...anything is done, I think that those who admire whomever is being tributed are a bit wary of how it all might turn out. I certainly was when I saw the line up for this. Some of the artists I trust to give a good performance, some of them I never heard of and some of them...yeah, no. But I was pleasantly surprised for the most part. So, let me do some rapid fire reviews of all the singin'.
The whole thing started with a medley, led by Demi Lovato, for some reason. Yeah, I am SO not a fan of hers. She sang "Stayin' Alive" as part of said medley, but then they let her sing again! "If I Can't Have You", the second time. WHY! Anywho, someone named Andra Day, who I've never heard of sang "Night Fever", and later she sang "Love So Right". Tori Kelly sang "Tragedy", and then they had her sing again, but the same song. Okay, then. And Little Big Town sang "How Deep Is Your Love?" Again, once as part of the medley and then once more later. What? Why are there repeats? The Bee Gees' catalog is huge. Anyway, I didn't mind those last three singing again, because I actually like how they sing. Moving on.
Ed Sheeran sang "Massachusetts", and whilst it started a little strange for me, he ended up doing a good job. Two Jonas brothers sang, Joe and his band DNCE performed "Night Fever" (again with the repeats!) and Nick did a tribute to Andy Gibb by singing "I Just Want To Be Your Everything". I will say, they hit the high notes extraordinarily well.
As I mentioned, I was not crazy about Demi Lovato, nor was I about the appearances of John Legend and Jason Derulo. Again, not a fan of either, but lucky for them, they were paired up with much better artists, Stevie Wonder and Tavares, respectively. Sorry, I don't mean to be mean, but I have to be honest. Now back to the good news.
Pentatonix did great with "Too Much Heaven" and Panic At the Disco, a band I had heard of but never really listened to, were amazing with "Lonely Days". Might have to look into them. They gave the country hit "Islands In the Stream" to Thomas Rhett and Kelsea Ballerini, more singers I've never listened to. But again, I was impressed.
The highlights for me, personally, were Katherine McPhee singing "Emotion" (better than Destiny's Child, FYI) and Keith Urban covering "To Love Somebody". And of course, Celine Dion had to make me cry whilst performing "Immortality", the song she recorded with the Bee Gees about 20 years ago. It was a bit of an 'In Memorium' moment for Robin, Maurice and Andy, as well as her brother and husband. Yes, a lot of tears with that one.
As far as non-singing appearances go, John Travolta participated a lot, telling some great stories about the Saturday Night Fever experience. And Olivia Newton-John spoke some lovely words about Andy, who she was great friends with. I'm so glad that he was talked about so much during this special. He deserves it.
But, of course, the best part was getting to hear Barry sing and talk about all the people who were a part of the success of the Bee Gees. And he acknowledged that some of their offspring were in attendance, though none of them performed. Why, I don't know, because I do know, for a fact, that some of their kids are insanely talented musicians. Oh, well. But we did get to hear him sing "Jive Talkin'" and "You Should Be Dancing" as well as "Stayin' Alive" with all the performers. Yeah, he's still pretty dynamic, even at the age of 70. Amazing.
All in all, the whole thing was pretty entertaining. It had some stumbles, like not performing anything from my favorite album and no mention of the sequel to Saturday Night Fever, Staying Alive. What's up with that? But most of the artists did a decent job. Honestly, considering how many songs the Bee Gees recorded, we might need to do this on a monthly basis. It could be a good tradition. I sure do a lot of wishful thinking, don't I?
Point is, I love the music that those three incredible men created. They have been one of the biggest inspirations to me as a writer and as a person. They gave us all so many gifts through those songs and how they achieved so much. I am eternally grateful to them.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
So, last night, CBS aired a big old tribute to my beloved Bee Gees. Good timing, I'd say, since 50 years ago, they hit it big in the U.S., 40 years ago, they recorded the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack, and most importantly, 20 years ago, they released Still Waters, my favorite of their albums. Yes, that last one is most important.
Now, anytime a tribute...anything is done, I think that those who admire whomever is being tributed are a bit wary of how it all might turn out. I certainly was when I saw the line up for this. Some of the artists I trust to give a good performance, some of them I never heard of and some of them...yeah, no. But I was pleasantly surprised for the most part. So, let me do some rapid fire reviews of all the singin'.
The whole thing started with a medley, led by Demi Lovato, for some reason. Yeah, I am SO not a fan of hers. She sang "Stayin' Alive" as part of said medley, but then they let her sing again! "If I Can't Have You", the second time. WHY! Anywho, someone named Andra Day, who I've never heard of sang "Night Fever", and later she sang "Love So Right". Tori Kelly sang "Tragedy", and then they had her sing again, but the same song. Okay, then. And Little Big Town sang "How Deep Is Your Love?" Again, once as part of the medley and then once more later. What? Why are there repeats? The Bee Gees' catalog is huge. Anyway, I didn't mind those last three singing again, because I actually like how they sing. Moving on.
Ed Sheeran sang "Massachusetts", and whilst it started a little strange for me, he ended up doing a good job. Two Jonas brothers sang, Joe and his band DNCE performed "Night Fever" (again with the repeats!) and Nick did a tribute to Andy Gibb by singing "I Just Want To Be Your Everything". I will say, they hit the high notes extraordinarily well.
As I mentioned, I was not crazy about Demi Lovato, nor was I about the appearances of John Legend and Jason Derulo. Again, not a fan of either, but lucky for them, they were paired up with much better artists, Stevie Wonder and Tavares, respectively. Sorry, I don't mean to be mean, but I have to be honest. Now back to the good news.
Pentatonix did great with "Too Much Heaven" and Panic At the Disco, a band I had heard of but never really listened to, were amazing with "Lonely Days". Might have to look into them. They gave the country hit "Islands In the Stream" to Thomas Rhett and Kelsea Ballerini, more singers I've never listened to. But again, I was impressed.
The highlights for me, personally, were Katherine McPhee singing "Emotion" (better than Destiny's Child, FYI) and Keith Urban covering "To Love Somebody". And of course, Celine Dion had to make me cry whilst performing "Immortality", the song she recorded with the Bee Gees about 20 years ago. It was a bit of an 'In Memorium' moment for Robin, Maurice and Andy, as well as her brother and husband. Yes, a lot of tears with that one.
As far as non-singing appearances go, John Travolta participated a lot, telling some great stories about the Saturday Night Fever experience. And Olivia Newton-John spoke some lovely words about Andy, who she was great friends with. I'm so glad that he was talked about so much during this special. He deserves it.
But, of course, the best part was getting to hear Barry sing and talk about all the people who were a part of the success of the Bee Gees. And he acknowledged that some of their offspring were in attendance, though none of them performed. Why, I don't know, because I do know, for a fact, that some of their kids are insanely talented musicians. Oh, well. But we did get to hear him sing "Jive Talkin'" and "You Should Be Dancing" as well as "Stayin' Alive" with all the performers. Yeah, he's still pretty dynamic, even at the age of 70. Amazing.
All in all, the whole thing was pretty entertaining. It had some stumbles, like not performing anything from my favorite album and no mention of the sequel to Saturday Night Fever, Staying Alive. What's up with that? But most of the artists did a decent job. Honestly, considering how many songs the Bee Gees recorded, we might need to do this on a monthly basis. It could be a good tradition. I sure do a lot of wishful thinking, don't I?
Point is, I love the music that those three incredible men created. They have been one of the biggest inspirations to me as a writer and as a person. They gave us all so many gifts through those songs and how they achieved so much. I am eternally grateful to them.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
Friday, April 14, 2017
Detachment - Movie Review
Greetings,
I'm not certain, but I'd probably place bets on the idea that "Teacher Films" is an official genre. I have seen quite a few movies that deal with teachers and students and schools, some funny, some uplifting, some depressing, some...all of those things. And that might make you venture to think that we have enough of them. Well, I've seen some that make me think we do, but then, I find a really good one that makes me want even more. Such is the case with the film, Detachment.
Detachment is a 2011 movie directed by Tony Kaye and starring Adrien Brody as Henry Barthes, a substitute teacher at a very flawed school. Oh, which ones aren't these days? Anyway, can I say that I love Adrien Brody. He is just a delight, and frankly, I think this is his best performance ever. Yes, even more than that other one that got him some award. You know to what I am referring? But, I don't know, I guess I just have a thing for teachers who try to reach their students, no matter how difficult it is. And in this film, it very much is. Still, that is not the only thing with which he is struggling to do. During the time frame of the film, which I believe is about a month, there is so much happening to him and around him that it is practically overwhelming.
In regards to Henry's life, he has a connection of sorts at school with a fellow teacher, played by Christina Hendricks, as well as with a student, played by Betty Kaye, who happens to be the director's daughter. Relax, though. Whether or not nepotism had anything to do with that casting, she did a great job, so who cares? In the meantime, he's coping with his ailing grandfather, his memories of a tragic childhood and a young prostitute, played by Sami Gayle, who he tries to take care of by way of becoming a kind of surrogate father figure. So, to say that he's dealing with quite a few things would be a understatement, but watching his journey through all of it is fascinating and heartbreaking.
Actually, though Brody's Henry is the central character, there are many others with many other stories, and thankfully, they've got a pretty decent cast to carry it all out. We've got the likes of William Peterson, Blythe Danner, James Caan...Oh, speaking of him, there is one scene where he shows a young girl a picture of something and it's a bit...off-putting, to say the least. So, heads up on that one. And for me to be giving that kind of warning in a movie that deals with some seriously harsh issues, you know I'm being serious. Moving on. We also have Marcia Gay Harden portraying the principal, who is realizing that things are beginning to fall apart for her, and Lucy Liu, as the school counselor, who is struggling with trying to get through to the students, which is inching her closer to her personal edge. Both of these women are phenomenal in these highly emotional, yet believable roles.
So, yes, there is quite a lot going on here, but that's the thing about this film. Technically, it is about teachers and students and school, but if you look deeper, it's about so many of these people being lost in their own individual way and trying to figure out what is happening within themselves and in the world in which they are made to live. They're either looking for a way out or looking for a way to fix things or even both. Frankly, I think if you look passed this being "just another high school movie", which it is not, you can see the stories that are truly being told. And how difficult it is to hear them.
In the end, I would recommend Detachment. Obviously, I think it's worth a watch just for the performances, especially Adrien Brody. And while it is hard to watch at times, as I mentioned, it is certainly a film that can affect you in a very profound way. I'd say that, in this time where movies rarely do that anymore, or even try to do that, what you can get out of this movie is extremely welcome.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
I'm not certain, but I'd probably place bets on the idea that "Teacher Films" is an official genre. I have seen quite a few movies that deal with teachers and students and schools, some funny, some uplifting, some depressing, some...all of those things. And that might make you venture to think that we have enough of them. Well, I've seen some that make me think we do, but then, I find a really good one that makes me want even more. Such is the case with the film, Detachment.
Detachment is a 2011 movie directed by Tony Kaye and starring Adrien Brody as Henry Barthes, a substitute teacher at a very flawed school. Oh, which ones aren't these days? Anyway, can I say that I love Adrien Brody. He is just a delight, and frankly, I think this is his best performance ever. Yes, even more than that other one that got him some award. You know to what I am referring? But, I don't know, I guess I just have a thing for teachers who try to reach their students, no matter how difficult it is. And in this film, it very much is. Still, that is not the only thing with which he is struggling to do. During the time frame of the film, which I believe is about a month, there is so much happening to him and around him that it is practically overwhelming.
In regards to Henry's life, he has a connection of sorts at school with a fellow teacher, played by Christina Hendricks, as well as with a student, played by Betty Kaye, who happens to be the director's daughter. Relax, though. Whether or not nepotism had anything to do with that casting, she did a great job, so who cares? In the meantime, he's coping with his ailing grandfather, his memories of a tragic childhood and a young prostitute, played by Sami Gayle, who he tries to take care of by way of becoming a kind of surrogate father figure. So, to say that he's dealing with quite a few things would be a understatement, but watching his journey through all of it is fascinating and heartbreaking.
Actually, though Brody's Henry is the central character, there are many others with many other stories, and thankfully, they've got a pretty decent cast to carry it all out. We've got the likes of William Peterson, Blythe Danner, James Caan...Oh, speaking of him, there is one scene where he shows a young girl a picture of something and it's a bit...off-putting, to say the least. So, heads up on that one. And for me to be giving that kind of warning in a movie that deals with some seriously harsh issues, you know I'm being serious. Moving on. We also have Marcia Gay Harden portraying the principal, who is realizing that things are beginning to fall apart for her, and Lucy Liu, as the school counselor, who is struggling with trying to get through to the students, which is inching her closer to her personal edge. Both of these women are phenomenal in these highly emotional, yet believable roles.
So, yes, there is quite a lot going on here, but that's the thing about this film. Technically, it is about teachers and students and school, but if you look deeper, it's about so many of these people being lost in their own individual way and trying to figure out what is happening within themselves and in the world in which they are made to live. They're either looking for a way out or looking for a way to fix things or even both. Frankly, I think if you look passed this being "just another high school movie", which it is not, you can see the stories that are truly being told. And how difficult it is to hear them.
In the end, I would recommend Detachment. Obviously, I think it's worth a watch just for the performances, especially Adrien Brody. And while it is hard to watch at times, as I mentioned, it is certainly a film that can affect you in a very profound way. I'd say that, in this time where movies rarely do that anymore, or even try to do that, what you can get out of this movie is extremely welcome.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
Tuesday, March 28, 2017
Best Worst Thing That Ever Could Have Happened - Documentary Review
Greetings,
I'm pretty sure that somebody once mentioned that there is no recipe for success. Sometimes things work out; sometimes they don't. Really, no matter what you throw into your routine, you are not promised the outcome you want or are expecting. And nowhere is this more evident than in the entertainment industry. I mean, how many times have you heard about movies coming out with acclaimed everything, from directors to craft service people, and then, they fail miserably, either commercially or critically or both. You just never can tell what will make people love something. Such was the case of the story that is told in the 2016 documentary, Best Worst Thing That Could Have Happened.
So, back in 1981, a little musical made its Broadway debut, entitled, Merrily We Roll Along. It was based on a 1934 play of the same name, with the book written by George Furth, the songs written by Stephen Sondheim and all of it directed by Hal Prince. No way could this thing fail. Right? Anyway, it's about this guy who works in Hollywood, but he used to write songs for Broadway. And it goes backwards. And he's got these friends. And...Yeah, I really couldn't follow the narrative of this thing. I don't think other people could either. That could be one of the reasons why this production didn't exactly hit the stratosphere. But there were also a few others.
Yes, as it turned out, despite having some players with amazing pedigree, Merrily We Roll Along closed after a mere sixteen performances. It's probably one of the most well-known musicals that didn't do so well. But in subsequent years, other productions have been presented and there is more of an appreciation for what was done with the show. In fact, it's kind of known as a classic now.
As with most documentaries of this nature, it is full of interviews with a lot of the people who were involved. In fact, this film was directed by Lonny Price, who was a member of the original cast. Although, some of us know him as Ronnie from The Muppets Take Manhattan. Good times, indeed. Anyway, it was interesting to get some insight from the young people who were a part of that first production, especially since so many of them were very young, practically kids in some cases. And talking about how it affected their lives, for better or worse, was clearly an emotional experience for them. Of course, I would be remiss if I didn't mention that one of those interviewees was Jason Alexander. Isn't he just a delight?
In additions to all the interviews, there is tons of footage of rehearsals and auditions. You really do get to see the whole process that they had to go through, and that most shows have to go through on the road to the stage. As someone who enjoys being a behind the scenes voyeur, I found some of it interesting. Although, since I have seen quite a few documentaries like this, such as Every Little Step or Show Business: The Road to Broadway, it was, for me, a bit familiar.
Still, every story is its own story and while the process of putting together a Broadway production can have similarities to all the others, outside occurrences will cause the path to be a little different for each one. And the story of Merrily We Roll Along is unique unto itself in a lot of ways.
So, if you are a Broadway lover and if you're interested in hearing all those tales behind the productions from the people who lived through them and are still affected by them, I say that Best Worst Thing That Ever Could Have Happened might be worth a watch for you.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
I'm pretty sure that somebody once mentioned that there is no recipe for success. Sometimes things work out; sometimes they don't. Really, no matter what you throw into your routine, you are not promised the outcome you want or are expecting. And nowhere is this more evident than in the entertainment industry. I mean, how many times have you heard about movies coming out with acclaimed everything, from directors to craft service people, and then, they fail miserably, either commercially or critically or both. You just never can tell what will make people love something. Such was the case of the story that is told in the 2016 documentary, Best Worst Thing That Could Have Happened.
So, back in 1981, a little musical made its Broadway debut, entitled, Merrily We Roll Along. It was based on a 1934 play of the same name, with the book written by George Furth, the songs written by Stephen Sondheim and all of it directed by Hal Prince. No way could this thing fail. Right? Anyway, it's about this guy who works in Hollywood, but he used to write songs for Broadway. And it goes backwards. And he's got these friends. And...Yeah, I really couldn't follow the narrative of this thing. I don't think other people could either. That could be one of the reasons why this production didn't exactly hit the stratosphere. But there were also a few others.
Yes, as it turned out, despite having some players with amazing pedigree, Merrily We Roll Along closed after a mere sixteen performances. It's probably one of the most well-known musicals that didn't do so well. But in subsequent years, other productions have been presented and there is more of an appreciation for what was done with the show. In fact, it's kind of known as a classic now.
As with most documentaries of this nature, it is full of interviews with a lot of the people who were involved. In fact, this film was directed by Lonny Price, who was a member of the original cast. Although, some of us know him as Ronnie from The Muppets Take Manhattan. Good times, indeed. Anyway, it was interesting to get some insight from the young people who were a part of that first production, especially since so many of them were very young, practically kids in some cases. And talking about how it affected their lives, for better or worse, was clearly an emotional experience for them. Of course, I would be remiss if I didn't mention that one of those interviewees was Jason Alexander. Isn't he just a delight?
In additions to all the interviews, there is tons of footage of rehearsals and auditions. You really do get to see the whole process that they had to go through, and that most shows have to go through on the road to the stage. As someone who enjoys being a behind the scenes voyeur, I found some of it interesting. Although, since I have seen quite a few documentaries like this, such as Every Little Step or Show Business: The Road to Broadway, it was, for me, a bit familiar.
Still, every story is its own story and while the process of putting together a Broadway production can have similarities to all the others, outside occurrences will cause the path to be a little different for each one. And the story of Merrily We Roll Along is unique unto itself in a lot of ways.
So, if you are a Broadway lover and if you're interested in hearing all those tales behind the productions from the people who lived through them and are still affected by them, I say that Best Worst Thing That Ever Could Have Happened might be worth a watch for you.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
Thursday, March 23, 2017
Top Ten Wishlist for the Overdue Podcast
Greetings,
I've heard that a good man is hard to find. Agree. But I'll tell you something. A good podcast is even harder to find. No bull crap. You'd think with millions upon millions of them out there, it would be easier to find more that are worth listening to. Not in my opinion, but that's why I'm working on starting my own. Eventually. Because everything I do is golden...I tell myself. Fortunately, I have found a few of these "21st Century Old-Timey Radio Shows" (What?) that I do, in fact, enjoy giving a listen to. None of them are perfect, but what is? However, I did find a pretty good one and it's all about books! Hooray! And since I spent all last week doing book reviews on the blog, I thought I'd keep that theme going by talking about this. It's called the Overdue Podcast. Get it. Because books at the library can be overdue. That's right. I'm the one who ruins everything with explanations. Deal with it.
Anyway, the Overdue Podcast is hosted by two friends named Craig and Andrew. And it definitely sounds like it's hosted by two friends. In fact, that's one of the things I like most about it. There's just something very nice about hearing some genuine comradery, and it's even better when they're talking about books. Good times, indeed. Especially good times since they go off on tangents way less than other podcasts I've listened to. For real, when I want to hear people talk about terrible 90's sitcoms, I don't want to go off into uncomfortable territory. Just sayin'. So, as I like to make lists, I decide to make a WISH-list of the books I hope that these guys will one day discuss. Most of them I've read; some I haven't. But all, I feel, are worthy of some examination. Sounds like a decent idea. Kind of.
As it turns out, the very existence of this list may be a bit - and I hate to use this word, as it is my current least favorite - problematic. See, the premise of the podcast is that one of them reads a book they've never read before. And I don't know what they've read. Also, some of these may already be in their TBR jar, which is most likely decorated with stickers and sparkles, just like mine. So, my requesting them may be pointless. And finally, they do have a Patreon, where people who become patrons can request books. But under present circumstances, I am SO not in the position to give money away. Of course, time is money, and this list is taking up my time, so.... Yeah, I still feel like I'm cheating.
Oh, and no, I am not going to request any of my own books. Even though next month is National Poetry Month and I would be happy to send them free copies, I am not that desperate for exposure in order to sell books. I mean, I am, but I can take the day off. Because today is not about me. It's about spreading the word about a very entertaining couple of guys and the great work they do, talking about the wonder of the written word. And it is such great work that now I will proceed to tell them exactly what I think they should be doing where that is concerned. Enjoy!
Honorable Mention: The Last Sin Eater by Francine Rivers a.k.a My Favorite Book - So, why only an honorable mention if it's my favorite? Well, that is precisely why. I'm open to hearing their opinion on it, but I am also very protective of it. I'm like one of those Directioners who come to the defense of those guys no matter what foolish thing they do. Or something. But I suppose I can bring attention to it as a potential possibility.
#10. The Neverending Story by Michael Ende - This is one of the books that I haven't read yet. I'm putting it off because I feel like, as soon as I start reading it, all I'm gonna hear in my head is the theme song from the movie. I just want the guys to read it to see if this happens to them. And if it does, I apologize.
#9. Paper Towns by John Green - They already covered a John Green book, and that was a great episode. I personally did not care for this book, nor anything I've ever read by its author. However, I'm interested in hearing their take on the Margo character, and if they hate her as much as I and many others do. Yeah, I'm mean. What about it?
#8. U.F.O's, J.F.K. and Elvis: Conspiracies You Don't Have To Be Crazy to Believe by Richard Belzer - No, I didn't make this one up. Stop asking. And no, I am not a conspiracy theorist. But I was, and possibly still am, a fan of Richard Belzer's. I just think this one may make for some amusing exchanges between the guys, to say nothing of a discussion on other conspiracy theories. Just for fun.
#7. The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver - This is the other one I haven't read yet. But this was an Oprah Book Club selection back in the day, and I remember something interesting that the author said on the show. Apparently, this book has five different main characters (it's a family) and she wrote the entire book from all five different perspectives. Yes, she wrote the book five times, just so she could get to know all the voices and write them distinctly, perfectly. Even I don't work that hard. But I wonder if this effort was worth it, if it achieved the goal and if the guys can tell the difference between those voices.
#6. Anything by Sidney Sheldon, but probably Master of the Game, because that's my favorite - What? I'm allowed to be vague. I may, on occasion, refer to Sidney Sheldon as my favorite writer, if for no other reason than I own ALL of his books, of which there are many. But he is very good. And any one of his books are worthy of some serious discussion. I just happened to like the aforementioned one best, and it is probably the most complex. So, good luck.
#5. Faithful Place by Tana French - Well, they already talked about the first two books by Tana French, and those are a couple of my favorite episodes. This is the third one, which is just as good, in my opinion. I'd love for them to continue exploring the tales of the...Dublin Murder Squad, which totally exists. I don't care what anyone says. Just get out of here with your facts and your knowledge.
#4. The Sherlockian by Graham Moore - When the guys did an episode about The Hound of the Baskervilles, they talked about a group of nerds (their word; not mine) who are super into the whole Sherlock thing. Almost...suspiciously super into. So, I figured maybe they'd like to read a whole book about them, and just mock them to their hearts' content. Or maybe they'll find a decent story in there. You just never know.
#3. The Island of Dr. Moreau by H.G. Wells - If they decide to read and discuss this book, I hope that some part of said discussion is devoted to how we need to give it one more cinematic chance. It's something I believe in deeply, and I want others to be on my side. But just get rid of the "Cat Woman". She's NOT in the book!
#2. Deception Point by Dan Brown - The first episode of the Overdue Podcast that I listened to was about The Da Vinci Code, so it holds a special place in my heart. It also remains one of my favorites. So, what better idea (besides my #1) than to cover another book by Dan Brown, except this time, sans Robert Langdon. I know. What's a Dan Brown book with out Dan Brown's self-insert character? Hopefully, they'll find out.
#1. Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy - Yeah, that's right. I went there. But only because I trust that they can do this. And I love this book. Not the titular character, mind you, but certainly the book that surrounds her. When I read this, I had to pace myself, but I don't know if they'll have that kind of time, so I'll just wish them luck. Also, if they choose this one, may I suggest the edition that Oprah used when she chose this for the book club. It's actually a very good translation. And why am I talking about Oprah so much? Anyway, I do believe this book is quite rich and will bring forth some great discussion. What more can I ask for from a podcast like this?
And there's my wishlist for the gentlemen of the Overdue Podcast, which you should all check out. Check out? Again with the library puns. I am the funniest person in the world, it would seem. Anyway, these are merely requests; certainly not demands. Hopefully, though, it might give them a good idea or two. I mean, it's the least I can do considering how much I've enjoyed this podcast, even in the moments where I may disagree with them or their opinions. Yeah, I can disagree with them and still like them. I'm magic, apparently. And I will always give credit to people who love books and are willing to share that with others. We need as many of those as we can get.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
I've heard that a good man is hard to find. Agree. But I'll tell you something. A good podcast is even harder to find. No bull crap. You'd think with millions upon millions of them out there, it would be easier to find more that are worth listening to. Not in my opinion, but that's why I'm working on starting my own. Eventually. Because everything I do is golden...I tell myself. Fortunately, I have found a few of these "21st Century Old-Timey Radio Shows" (What?) that I do, in fact, enjoy giving a listen to. None of them are perfect, but what is? However, I did find a pretty good one and it's all about books! Hooray! And since I spent all last week doing book reviews on the blog, I thought I'd keep that theme going by talking about this. It's called the Overdue Podcast. Get it. Because books at the library can be overdue. That's right. I'm the one who ruins everything with explanations. Deal with it.
Anyway, the Overdue Podcast is hosted by two friends named Craig and Andrew. And it definitely sounds like it's hosted by two friends. In fact, that's one of the things I like most about it. There's just something very nice about hearing some genuine comradery, and it's even better when they're talking about books. Good times, indeed. Especially good times since they go off on tangents way less than other podcasts I've listened to. For real, when I want to hear people talk about terrible 90's sitcoms, I don't want to go off into uncomfortable territory. Just sayin'. So, as I like to make lists, I decide to make a WISH-list of the books I hope that these guys will one day discuss. Most of them I've read; some I haven't. But all, I feel, are worthy of some examination. Sounds like a decent idea. Kind of.
As it turns out, the very existence of this list may be a bit - and I hate to use this word, as it is my current least favorite - problematic. See, the premise of the podcast is that one of them reads a book they've never read before. And I don't know what they've read. Also, some of these may already be in their TBR jar, which is most likely decorated with stickers and sparkles, just like mine. So, my requesting them may be pointless. And finally, they do have a Patreon, where people who become patrons can request books. But under present circumstances, I am SO not in the position to give money away. Of course, time is money, and this list is taking up my time, so.... Yeah, I still feel like I'm cheating.
Oh, and no, I am not going to request any of my own books. Even though next month is National Poetry Month and I would be happy to send them free copies, I am not that desperate for exposure in order to sell books. I mean, I am, but I can take the day off. Because today is not about me. It's about spreading the word about a very entertaining couple of guys and the great work they do, talking about the wonder of the written word. And it is such great work that now I will proceed to tell them exactly what I think they should be doing where that is concerned. Enjoy!
Honorable Mention: The Last Sin Eater by Francine Rivers a.k.a My Favorite Book - So, why only an honorable mention if it's my favorite? Well, that is precisely why. I'm open to hearing their opinion on it, but I am also very protective of it. I'm like one of those Directioners who come to the defense of those guys no matter what foolish thing they do. Or something. But I suppose I can bring attention to it as a potential possibility.
#10. The Neverending Story by Michael Ende - This is one of the books that I haven't read yet. I'm putting it off because I feel like, as soon as I start reading it, all I'm gonna hear in my head is the theme song from the movie. I just want the guys to read it to see if this happens to them. And if it does, I apologize.
#9. Paper Towns by John Green - They already covered a John Green book, and that was a great episode. I personally did not care for this book, nor anything I've ever read by its author. However, I'm interested in hearing their take on the Margo character, and if they hate her as much as I and many others do. Yeah, I'm mean. What about it?
#8. U.F.O's, J.F.K. and Elvis: Conspiracies You Don't Have To Be Crazy to Believe by Richard Belzer - No, I didn't make this one up. Stop asking. And no, I am not a conspiracy theorist. But I was, and possibly still am, a fan of Richard Belzer's. I just think this one may make for some amusing exchanges between the guys, to say nothing of a discussion on other conspiracy theories. Just for fun.
#7. The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver - This is the other one I haven't read yet. But this was an Oprah Book Club selection back in the day, and I remember something interesting that the author said on the show. Apparently, this book has five different main characters (it's a family) and she wrote the entire book from all five different perspectives. Yes, she wrote the book five times, just so she could get to know all the voices and write them distinctly, perfectly. Even I don't work that hard. But I wonder if this effort was worth it, if it achieved the goal and if the guys can tell the difference between those voices.
#6. Anything by Sidney Sheldon, but probably Master of the Game, because that's my favorite - What? I'm allowed to be vague. I may, on occasion, refer to Sidney Sheldon as my favorite writer, if for no other reason than I own ALL of his books, of which there are many. But he is very good. And any one of his books are worthy of some serious discussion. I just happened to like the aforementioned one best, and it is probably the most complex. So, good luck.
#5. Faithful Place by Tana French - Well, they already talked about the first two books by Tana French, and those are a couple of my favorite episodes. This is the third one, which is just as good, in my opinion. I'd love for them to continue exploring the tales of the...Dublin Murder Squad, which totally exists. I don't care what anyone says. Just get out of here with your facts and your knowledge.
#4. The Sherlockian by Graham Moore - When the guys did an episode about The Hound of the Baskervilles, they talked about a group of nerds (their word; not mine) who are super into the whole Sherlock thing. Almost...suspiciously super into. So, I figured maybe they'd like to read a whole book about them, and just mock them to their hearts' content. Or maybe they'll find a decent story in there. You just never know.
#3. The Island of Dr. Moreau by H.G. Wells - If they decide to read and discuss this book, I hope that some part of said discussion is devoted to how we need to give it one more cinematic chance. It's something I believe in deeply, and I want others to be on my side. But just get rid of the "Cat Woman". She's NOT in the book!
#2. Deception Point by Dan Brown - The first episode of the Overdue Podcast that I listened to was about The Da Vinci Code, so it holds a special place in my heart. It also remains one of my favorites. So, what better idea (besides my #1) than to cover another book by Dan Brown, except this time, sans Robert Langdon. I know. What's a Dan Brown book with out Dan Brown's self-insert character? Hopefully, they'll find out.
#1. Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy - Yeah, that's right. I went there. But only because I trust that they can do this. And I love this book. Not the titular character, mind you, but certainly the book that surrounds her. When I read this, I had to pace myself, but I don't know if they'll have that kind of time, so I'll just wish them luck. Also, if they choose this one, may I suggest the edition that Oprah used when she chose this for the book club. It's actually a very good translation. And why am I talking about Oprah so much? Anyway, I do believe this book is quite rich and will bring forth some great discussion. What more can I ask for from a podcast like this?
And there's my wishlist for the gentlemen of the Overdue Podcast, which you should all check out. Check out? Again with the library puns. I am the funniest person in the world, it would seem. Anyway, these are merely requests; certainly not demands. Hopefully, though, it might give them a good idea or two. I mean, it's the least I can do considering how much I've enjoyed this podcast, even in the moments where I may disagree with them or their opinions. Yeah, I can disagree with them and still like them. I'm magic, apparently. And I will always give credit to people who love books and are willing to share that with others. We need as many of those as we can get.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
Saturday, March 18, 2017
Touched With Fire: Manic Depressive Illness and Artistic Temperment by Kay Redfield Jamison - Book Review
Greetings,
Last year, I reviewed a movie called Touched With Fire. I thought it was brilliantly made, on so many levels, but it also struck a chord with me, due to its subject. I went into this a bit during that review, but the best way to go even deeper is to talk about the book from which it spawned, Touched With Fire: Manic Depressive Illness and Artistic Temperment by Kay Redfield Jamison.
As stated in the title, this book explores how certain mood disorders can lend itself to intense creativity for those who have them. It cites an extremely high number of artists and writers who either definitely had or could have had some form of manic depressive illness, and shows how extreme they were with their work. Jamison also writes about her own struggles and how she eventually sought out the help that saved her life.
If it isn't already obvious by the description, this book is not exactly light reading. It delves pretty deep into the details, using medical terms and whatnot, and you have to stay focused on it. And considering what it's about, it can get heavy. I know all of that may not seem like the most fun reading experience, but it could be very important, especially for those who deal with these issues. It sheds light on things they may be experiencing, giving some valid explanations as to why they are.
What this book mainly does is try to show how all that talk about "mad geniuses" may be rooted is something very real. It has often been said that there is a fine line between genius and madness, and Jamison shows what it may be for a lot of people. As many artists, including myself, can attest to, there is a overwhelming aspect to those bouts of intense creativity. Sometimes it is frightening; sometimes it is captivating. And for the latter, it can seduce you into always wanting to stay in the highest levels of your emotions, even though doing so can be dangerous. But even with that warning, it can often be just too intoxicating. But through the help she got herself, she realized that she could let her creativity thrive without letting it control her to that dangerous degree. It's like how a campfire can keep you warm in the cold night, but if you don't keep an eye on it and keep it under control, it can burn down the whole forest. And keeping that fire in check does not diminish from the good it can do. In fact, when things are not out of control, when you can focus, that is when the work can get done.
Now, I have heard some critics of this book accusing the author of romanticizing mental illness by attaching it to all these great and renowned artists. I don't feel she is doing that at all. In fact, the artists and writers mentioned in the book, whilst, indeed, great and renowned, did not exactly lead the easiest of lives. Far from that. Yes, it may seem lovely to be able to paint pretty pictures and write pretty words, but if you look at many of them, they lived with a lot of turmoil. There is nothing to romanticize about that. Speaking from personal experience, it is a harsh road I have to travel on to get to what eventually comes from me by way of my writing. I am grateful that anything good can come out of it, but that does not diminish the struggle. Only finding a way to deal with it can help you with that. Again, thankfully, in my case, my writing is a result, but also a kind of treatment for what I go through.
So, it is difficult for me to know who to recommend this book to. It is well-written enough that it could interest a lot of different people, but again, some of the heaviness may not be what they're interested in. Still, if the subject intrigues you, it is worth a read. Also, if you are someone who suspects you may be dealing with the issues described in this book, or if the book itself makes you suspect that, please do me, and especially yourself, a favor. Ask for help from a professional on the matter. Do not make assumptions. Do not self-diagnose. And for the love of all things sacred, DO NOT LOOK FOR ANSWERS ON TUMBLR!!! Believe it or not, that last one was not a joke. At all! The best and wisest action is to go to someone who is an expert on the subject who can really help.
In closing, this book was fascinating and very helpful to me, as it was for many people who could relate to its subject, much like how the story told in the film of the same name did so as well. Sometimes, all it takes for things to start getting better is knowing that there is someone else out there who can understand. Someone else who survived.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
My Review of the film Touched With Fire: blogspot
Last year, I reviewed a movie called Touched With Fire. I thought it was brilliantly made, on so many levels, but it also struck a chord with me, due to its subject. I went into this a bit during that review, but the best way to go even deeper is to talk about the book from which it spawned, Touched With Fire: Manic Depressive Illness and Artistic Temperment by Kay Redfield Jamison.
As stated in the title, this book explores how certain mood disorders can lend itself to intense creativity for those who have them. It cites an extremely high number of artists and writers who either definitely had or could have had some form of manic depressive illness, and shows how extreme they were with their work. Jamison also writes about her own struggles and how she eventually sought out the help that saved her life.
If it isn't already obvious by the description, this book is not exactly light reading. It delves pretty deep into the details, using medical terms and whatnot, and you have to stay focused on it. And considering what it's about, it can get heavy. I know all of that may not seem like the most fun reading experience, but it could be very important, especially for those who deal with these issues. It sheds light on things they may be experiencing, giving some valid explanations as to why they are.
What this book mainly does is try to show how all that talk about "mad geniuses" may be rooted is something very real. It has often been said that there is a fine line between genius and madness, and Jamison shows what it may be for a lot of people. As many artists, including myself, can attest to, there is a overwhelming aspect to those bouts of intense creativity. Sometimes it is frightening; sometimes it is captivating. And for the latter, it can seduce you into always wanting to stay in the highest levels of your emotions, even though doing so can be dangerous. But even with that warning, it can often be just too intoxicating. But through the help she got herself, she realized that she could let her creativity thrive without letting it control her to that dangerous degree. It's like how a campfire can keep you warm in the cold night, but if you don't keep an eye on it and keep it under control, it can burn down the whole forest. And keeping that fire in check does not diminish from the good it can do. In fact, when things are not out of control, when you can focus, that is when the work can get done.
Now, I have heard some critics of this book accusing the author of romanticizing mental illness by attaching it to all these great and renowned artists. I don't feel she is doing that at all. In fact, the artists and writers mentioned in the book, whilst, indeed, great and renowned, did not exactly lead the easiest of lives. Far from that. Yes, it may seem lovely to be able to paint pretty pictures and write pretty words, but if you look at many of them, they lived with a lot of turmoil. There is nothing to romanticize about that. Speaking from personal experience, it is a harsh road I have to travel on to get to what eventually comes from me by way of my writing. I am grateful that anything good can come out of it, but that does not diminish the struggle. Only finding a way to deal with it can help you with that. Again, thankfully, in my case, my writing is a result, but also a kind of treatment for what I go through.
So, it is difficult for me to know who to recommend this book to. It is well-written enough that it could interest a lot of different people, but again, some of the heaviness may not be what they're interested in. Still, if the subject intrigues you, it is worth a read. Also, if you are someone who suspects you may be dealing with the issues described in this book, or if the book itself makes you suspect that, please do me, and especially yourself, a favor. Ask for help from a professional on the matter. Do not make assumptions. Do not self-diagnose. And for the love of all things sacred, DO NOT LOOK FOR ANSWERS ON TUMBLR!!! Believe it or not, that last one was not a joke. At all! The best and wisest action is to go to someone who is an expert on the subject who can really help.
In closing, this book was fascinating and very helpful to me, as it was for many people who could relate to its subject, much like how the story told in the film of the same name did so as well. Sometimes, all it takes for things to start getting better is knowing that there is someone else out there who can understand. Someone else who survived.
Love and full moons,
Becky the Writer
My Review of the film Touched With Fire: blogspot
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)